+0
1- If I had had more money,I would have gone to Japan TOMORROW. ( you didn't have money,you didn't go to Japan;tomorrow shouldn't be used here,if so,it's preferably to use the below sentence).

2- If I had had more money,I would go to Japan tomorrow. or I would be going to Japan tomorrow.( you didn't have money,you don't go to Japan tomorrow,or you're not going to Japan tomorrow).

If I want to use tomorrow,which of these sentences should be used ?
Thanks in advance.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments  
Hi,
everlastinghope 1- If I had had more money,I would have gone to Japan TOMORROW. ( you didn't have money,you didn't go to Japan;tomorrow shouldn't be used here,if so,it's preferably to use the below sentence).
- Doesn't seem right to me. 'I would have gone to Japan tomorrow.' doesn't work.
everlastinghope .2- If I had had more money,I would go to Japan tomorrow. or I would be going to Japan tomorrow.( you didn't have money,you don't go to Japan tomorrow,or you're not going to Japan tomorrow).
- First of, 'I would go to Japan tomorrow' is not correct here. It is 'would be going to Japan'.
'If I had had more money, I would be going to Japan tomorrow'.

But be carful:
'If I had had more money, I would be going to Japan tomorrow' - You didn't have money. But there are no informations if you have money now.
'If I had more money, I would be going to Japan tomorrow.' - You don't have money now.
everlastinghope .If I want to use tomorrow,which of these sentences should be used ?Thanks in advance.
The second one. (with 'would be going')
LS
Thanks Louis,in fact I and other contributors have discussed about that because someone has asked the same question,but we didn't agree and no one could convince the other part.

I would appreciate if I others can reply (natives if possible) so that I'll be sure about the real usage of third and mixed conditional with the adverb " tomorrow".

Thanks again,you cheered me up.
Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.
everlastinghopeIf I want to use tomorrow
These are both possible.

If I had had more money, I would have been going to Japan tomorrow.
If I had had more money, I would be going to Japan tomorrow.

CJ
  1. Do you mean that " If I had had more money, I would have gone to Japan tomorrow." is incorrect ?
  2. The sentences you gave,do they belong to the third conditional or mixed conditional ?
everlastinghopeDo you mean that " If I had had more money, I would have gone to Japan tomorrow." is incorrect ?
Not incorrect. Just a little awkward to my ear.
everlastinghopeThe sentences you gave,do they belong to the third conditional or mixed conditional ?
One of each! (You know this!)

CJ
Site Hint: Check out our list of pronunciation videos.
CalifJimIf I had had more money, I would have been going to Japan tomorrow.
If I had had more money, I would be going to Japan tomorrow.
If I had had more money, I would have gone to Japan tomorrow. ( a bit awkward but not incorrect )
Hi CJ
Could you tell me why all three sentences are correct please?

thank you.
lingotingCould you tell me why all three sentences are correct please?
They all have the words in the correct order to form correct English sentences. No rules of grammar are broken.

I don't know what else you have in mind.

CJ
I also am a little puzzled (which normally is a good thing, because it means I'm about to learn something).

I thought that when you opened with a Past Perfect, the time of speaking was as far as you could go, in terms of tense projection: If I had had more money, I would have bought a jet, and I would be in Brazil now.
(For the purpose of this post let me call the time of speaking position 1, the time of me buying a jet position 2, and the time at which I had the possibility to come into some money position 3)

The sentence If I had had more money, I would have been going to Japan tomorrow does not seem contrast with what I said above.
The way my non-native ears I read it, it could mean: I had booked a cruise for Japan that was scheduled to leave tomorrow, and I was supposed to cover the whole amount for the cruise before departure. Unfortunately the money I had planned to use for that didn't come in. But, If I had had more money, I would have been going to Japan tomorrow .
The important part here, at least from the perspective of my native language, is that there is a time prior to now (a position 2) when, had the condition been realized, I would have been able to say "I'll be leaving for Japan on Monday".
Even if there is a "tomorrow" in the sentence, the consequence that follows form the fulfillment of the condition takes place in position 2.
Instead, In the sentence If I had had more money, I would be going to Japan tomorrow, there is a gap between the condition (in position 3) and its consequence (in position 1), and I'm no longer sure on how to interpret it.
Although, to be honest, I'm not even sure that what I wrote made any sense.

H.
Teachers: We supply a list of EFL job vacancies
Show more