If there weren't anything...

If there wasn't anything...

Which phrase is right? Does the subjunctive nature mean it's "weren't?

Thanks a lot!
"If there weren't".. is what your grammar teacher will want from you but in speech you can use "if there wasn't..."
Senior Member2,916
Retired Moderator: A moderator who has retired.Trusted Users: Trusted users are allowed to use additional capabilities of the site such as private messaging to all users and various other advanced features. You cannot join this role unless you are promoted by an administrator.
Ok. Thank you!
Looking for ESL work?: Try our EFL / TOEFL / ESL Jobs Section!
AnonymousIf there weren't anything...

If there wasn't anything...

Which phrase is right? Does the subjunctive nature mean it's "weren't?
There is no context here so both are correct. "Wasn't" is past reality whereas "weren't" is hypothesis.
A: I went to the fridge and there wasn't anything in it. B: If there wasn't anything in it someone must have eaten it all. This is reality, not hypothesis.
A: The fridge is full. B: That's good. If there weren't anything in it I would have to go shopping. This is hypothesis, and contrary to reality.
Regular Member637
If there wasn't by... ?

If there wasn't for... ?
rwZsY
AnonymousIf there wasn't by... ?
If there wasn't for... ?
Neither of these is correct. Try to ask again in a different way if this was not your question.

CJ
Veteran Member73,281
Moderator: A super-user who takes care of the forums. You have the ability to message a moderator privately should you wish. These users have a range of elevated privileges including the deletion, editing and movement of posts when needed.Proficient Speaker: Users in this role are known to maintain an excellent grasp of the English language. You can only be promoted to this role by the Englishforums team.
i have the same problem but i still am not sure. because there wern't many or because there wasn't many ???? please help. thanks
Anonymous i I have the same problem
No, I don't think you have the same problem. This thread is about the choice between was and were in an if clause. You don't have if. You have because.

You are left with the simpler problem of agreement in a there construction. Here the verb agrees with the following noun phrase, which is the plural many in your sentence. So you need weren't.

CJ
Moderator: A super-user who takes care of the forums. You have the ability to message a moderator privately should you wish. These users have a range of elevated privileges including the deletion, editing and movement of posts when needed.Proficient Speaker: Users in this role are known to maintain an excellent grasp of the English language. You can only be promoted to this role by the Englishforums team.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2016, xC v7.3.1.34535. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive' or please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.
Views expressed in this community do not reflect the views of MediaCet LTD, and we are in no way liable for such content.
Offensive or malicious content will be removed immediately, please send an email to webmaster@mediacet.com