+0
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Opinions are divided on whether individuals should succumb to unpleasant situations like running out of money or doing uncontented jobs. From my perspective, I would advocate that people should make great efforts to ameliorate such circumstances and I will shed light on this for the following justifications.
Granted, proponents opine that refusing to fight against those unfavorable situations is understandable and of the optimum approach. This is predicated on the assumption that by courtesy of natural law, citizens are vulnerable to alter circumstances. Given the fact that scores of inhabitants derive from humble backgrounds and can hardly stand a chance of seeking newly remunerative occupations, especially in light of the intensely competitive job market. Hence, it is futile to mitigate those situations. However, this line of reasoning is not sound because there are a host of people nurtured in poverty-stricken families but garner highly respectable positions with elephantine material possessions, which Pham Nhat Phuong perfectly exemplifies this rationale. Despite being raised by impoverished parents, he soon becomes one of the most talented billionaires recognized by Forbes via his workaholic mentality and non-stop attempts.
In addition to the aforementioned implausibility, I am convinced that people should endeavor with a view to alleviating those bad circumstances. For one, challenging themselves with early hurdles like unsatisfactory jobs would be an efficacious gateway to own expertise in specific fields, which is conspicuously beneficial for them in their lifelong journey. For example, an employee invariably struggling with his colossal workload and numerous deadlines would palpably accumulate precious experiences while managing tasks and can translate them into tools for further prospects. On top of that, those who resort to scraping by with a minuscule amount of money in their early adulthood will unequivocally be individuals with good money management and organizing skills, which are exceedingly preponderant in this day and age.
In conclusion, while some subscribe that people should accept negative situations like shortage of money or doing uncontented jobs, I am of the opinion that enhancing those circumstances is necessary because of its merits encompassing expertise and money-organizing skills.

You might be interested in:

IELTS Writing Task 2?

Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other...

Ielts Writing Task 2?

It is thought by some individuals that there are more positive advantages of outdoor play than indoor ones for the development of children. In my view, I completely agree with...

Ielts Writing Task 2?

TASK 2: Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things. Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention...

Please Review My Writing Task 2?

It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Discuss both views + Give ur opinion. People have different views about...

IELTS Writing Task 2?

First and foremost, I would like to say thanks in advance to whoever spends their time looking at my work. As a person starting to learn to write properly by myself, I really...